Ft. Hood

Discuss the politics behind the gun industry.
User avatar
blueorison
Competition/Training Mod
Posts: 10672
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 14:28
custom title: UT/EA Pistol Captain
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by blueorison » 20 Oct 2010, 22:52

It says he did not fire the revolver. Then they say they heard shots that sounded like it came from different guns.

So...
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
The shooter will always matter more than the gear ever will.
Stop relying on others to do the work for you.
Shoot more, worry less.

DmL5
Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 21 Aug 2009, 01:03
Location: MO
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by DmL5 » 20 Oct 2010, 23:21

Buffman wrote:214 rounds and 6 magazines?? Even expending the one in the gun doesn't come out equal. did he fire the revolver?
That number probably includes casings from the shootout with police -- this source says 146 casings were recovered from inside the building. A witness that picked up the gun says the shooter had "skinny bullets with blue tips." As much work as the shooter put into planning this incident (two stacked lasers, extended magazines, etc), it's fortunate he went with SS197SR ammunition over the other types.

http://www.krqe.com/dpps/news/us/south/ ... g-_3616751" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

sabotteur
Senior Member
Posts: 1490
Joined: 21 Aug 2008, 07:39
custom title: Big Dog Outfitters
Location: A small farm in BFE Virginia
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by sabotteur » 21 Oct 2010, 06:08

Interesting. First time I've seen that we now know that he was using SS197 and not SS195, SS192, or the 'evil' SS190 that the media seems to have latched on to.

Thanks for posting the link.

User avatar
buckett
Junior Member
Posts: 248
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 10:31
custom title: Firefighter
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by buckett » 21 Oct 2010, 07:53

blueorison wrote:
Terrorist. Burn them all. The Bible says to wish peace and love upon your enemies. I wish them to be peaceful 6 feet under.

And he had BOTH red and green Lasermax? So he stacked one under the other? AND he had 30 round mags? This terrorist might as well be a barf.com fanboy, may he burn with them.

Sorry to get off topic. Back on topic, I hope he goes to prison, he won't last long.
Don't waste any time digging a grave. Throw him to the dogs.
My goal in life: To be the next John Moses Browning.

It takes 43 muscles to frown... 17 muscles to smile... But only 3 for a proper trigger squeeze.

DmL5
Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 21 Aug 2009, 01:03
Location: MO
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by DmL5 » 21 Oct 2010, 11:29

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/10/21/tex ... /?hpt=Sbin" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"He asked one question -- what's the most technologically advanced handgun?" Army Specialist William Gilbert testified.

"I asked him, 'What's your intended purpose?' " Gilbert said.

Hasan gave no answer, according to Gilbert, but said his two specifications were the most technologically advanced handgun and a high magazine capacity.

User avatar
blueorison
Competition/Training Mod
Posts: 10672
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 14:28
custom title: UT/EA Pistol Captain
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by blueorison » 21 Oct 2010, 11:55

1. He had a SCOPE on the GUN? In addition to a green AND red laser?

2. How much would you bet on, that he got his information about the pistol, from one of the "forums"...

3. His gun jammed, most likely round stuck in the chamber, which is why Kimberly Munley is STILL alive, or she would be toast by now

4. He was using ss197, had 2 of his mags fitted with 10 round extensions; definitely had info coming from some "forum"

All this is pretty wild, and I wouldn't believe it if they didn't testify to it.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
The shooter will always matter more than the gear ever will.
Stop relying on others to do the work for you.
Shoot more, worry less.

User avatar
buckett
Junior Member
Posts: 248
Joined: 08 Jun 2010, 10:31
custom title: Firefighter
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by buckett » 21 Oct 2010, 16:05

A scope too? It sounds like he's been learning from a video game...
My goal in life: To be the next John Moses Browning.

It takes 43 muscles to frown... 17 muscles to smile... But only 3 for a proper trigger squeeze.

SeaHawkDriver-B
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Joined: 11 Nov 2009, 13:15
Location: Embarked on 2 acres of floating Soverign US Territory
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by SeaHawkDriver-B » 21 Oct 2010, 16:35

As a career military officer, the report that these two jack<profanity> flag officers wrote is disgusting. Its a political hat-tip to the Obama administration, and is a disgrace to the men and women who died that day in the name of "Islam". Its treasonous and they should be indicted in their own Article 32, if not promptly shot by their own troops as a more expeditious matter of their disposal.

The military has done absolutely NOTHING to prevent Fort Hood from happening again. I can attest to this first hand. The entrenched leadership outright refuses to publically acknowledge the Islamic threat from within out of fear of career suicide. Instead they will cover this festering wound with tissue paper. There will be mandatory classes, sensitivity training, the normal fare... and maybe a few more 'random' searches at the front gate to ensure that none of our "soldiers" DARE to bring in their own weapons to defend themselves from situations like Fort Hood. Instead, we must rely on poorly equipped, poorly trained, and usually out-sourced and contracted gate guards, and skeleton bodies of military police that patrol our bases in junked-out Ford explorers, equipped with 15-year old Beretta M9's, loaded with standard pressure 9mm FMJ.

Stupdity will again rule the day, as it usually does within our ranks.

Interesting to see that the guy used the blue-tips, if he had half a brain on his head he would have gotten a case of brown-box SS192, and at least done an endurance test on his OD-green FsN to see if there would be any extraction failures. A quick backup gun in the same caliber would have been a better investment than an unfired .357.

And he had a 'scope' on it??? As far as I know, there is only ONE option, maybe two at the most, for installing a scope on top of the FsN, and both those dude are on this forum. So who is it? Anyone.... Bueler?.... Bueler?.....

dhpierre
Silver Member
Posts: 147
Joined: 07 Nov 2011, 16:22

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by dhpierre » 02 Jun 2012, 06:49

hookdriver wrote:A good opinion piece from WND on the disarming of soldiers on our own posts. I know some don't like WND, but this is opinion -- not news.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115985

Contains this great quote attributed to Thomas Paine:
Could the peaceable principle of the Quakers be universally established, arms and the art of war would be wholly extirpated: But we live not in a world of angels. … I am thus far a Quaker, that I would gladly agree with all the world to lay aside the use of arms, and settle matters by negotiation: but unless the whole will, the matter ends, and I take up my musket and thank heaven he has put it in my power.

I didn't realize that Clinton made such a large change in '93. I didn't join up until '97. Any members here share what weapon control was like on post prior to '93?
I served in the Air Force under 3 Presidents; Reagan, Bush and Clinton. Airmen living in the dorms had to have their guns locked in the base armory. Airmen living in base family housing could store their guns in their houses. Airmen were not allowed to carry open or CCW on base. Those rules may have tightened under President Clinton, I don't know, I didn't live on base under him. That was for stateside bases, overseas we were not allowed to have personal guns at all.

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 10 Aug 2012, 10:17

Another attack?
http://news.yahoo.com/awol-soldier-gets ... 29850.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
AWOL soldier gets life term for Fort Hood plot
WACO, Texas (AP) — An AWOL soldier convicted of planning to blow up a restaurant full of Fort Hood troops has been sentenced to life in prison by a federal judge in Texas.

Army Pfc. Naser Jason Abdo received the punishment Friday in Waco.

Abdo told authorities he planned to make bombs as part of a "massive attack" against Fort Hood soldiers last year. He was convicted in May on six federal charges, including attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction.

The 22-year-old represented himself at the sentencing.

Abdo was AWOL from Fort Campbell, Ky., when he was arrested with bomb-making materials last summer at a Fort Hood-area motel.
That's all they have right now.
What is with taking it out on Ft Hood? This guy was out of KY, why go to TX to wreak havoc?
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

User avatar
Cyberfly
Global Moderator
Posts: 10624
Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 18:44
custom title: Mens Room Attendant
Location: SE OKlahoma

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Cyberfly » 10 Aug 2012, 11:21

Hood...burka?
I have NO friggin idea. Just grasping at straws here...
Never confuse 'The will of the Majority' with 'The will of God'.
**This post created with 100% recycled photons!**

User avatar
flyingirish04
Gold Member
Posts: 4784
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 21:42
custom title: Mtn Man in Flatland
Location: Great Plains, USA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by flyingirish04 » 10 Aug 2012, 12:05

I mean, I LOATH Ft Hood and Killeen as much as the next guy. The place sucks. But blowing it up or shooting it up, not cool.
Killed Two Stones with One Bird.

ShockedNKansas
Senior Member
Posts: 992
Joined: 10 Feb 2011, 20:30
custom title: G0 SH0X

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by ShockedNKansas » 10 Aug 2012, 19:19

There's been a lot of talk in the hearing about the victim's autopsy reports. This is going to sound sick but... is there a way for us to see them? Perhaps via the Freedom of Information Act?

User avatar
Esteves
Wiki Moderator
Posts: 3168
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 10:23
custom title: Shhh!
Location: Tucson, AZ

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Esteves » 10 Aug 2012, 23:41

Perhaps Civics 101 will help with the how everything fits together question that you didn't ask.
http://www.dummies.com/store/product/Et ... 91714.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; might be the right place to start, though.
--
S
© 2004-2019 Esteves

Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative,
and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want
people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.

Grantness
Senior Member
Posts: 4728
Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 09:13
Location: Virginia

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Grantness » 11 Aug 2012, 08:26

So another (ostensibly) Islamist tries to blow up Fort Hood soldiers and its not all over the news? I am bewildered by the media's reluctance to admit that these are acts of terrorism...

User avatar
jgreenberg01
Platinum Member
Posts: 3737
Joined: 17 Jul 2009, 14:32
custom title: FNP-45 Cylon
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by jgreenberg01 » 11 Aug 2012, 08:45

This was actually in the news back in July, 2011-ish. The reporting did subside fairly quickly, but still, I'm surprised you guys missed.
0100001101101111011011010110010100100000011000010110111001100100001000000111010001100001011010110110010100100000011010010111010000101110

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 03 Jun 2013, 14:36

This is still not resolved. Some excerpts:
http://news.yahoo.com/ft-hood-suspect-d ... 07014.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Army psychiatrist charged in the deadly 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage said Monday that he'll use a "defense of others" argument when he represents himself at his upcoming murder trial.

Hasan, 42, faces the death penalty or life without parole if convicted of 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder.

Hasan, who was set to deploy to Afghanistan with some of the troops killed that day on the Texas Army post, likely will try to show that he was trying to defend Muslims against U.S. troops in a war that he believes is illegal and immoral, military law experts said. To prove a "defense of others" argument, a defendant must show a threat was imminent.

"Even if he feels the U.S. is in an unjustified war, this defendant is not going to be able to show a threat was immediate because these soldiers were on U.S. soil and unarmed," said Jeff Addicott, director of the Center for Terrorism Law at St. Mary's University in San Antonio, who is not involved in Hasan's case.
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

User avatar
jgreenberg01
Platinum Member
Posts: 3737
Joined: 17 Jul 2009, 14:32
custom title: FNP-45 Cylon
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by jgreenberg01 » 03 Jun 2013, 14:52

It's infuriating to read that there is any defense that can be used for his actions. But when you read on in the article you see:
At a hearing in May, Hasan told Osborn that he wanted to plead guilty. But Army rules prohibit a judge from accepting a guilty plea to charges that could result in a death sentence. Osborn also denied his request to plead guilty to lesser murder charges, citing legal issues that could have arisen because his death penalty trial still would have proceeded.
We have some interesting rules - the guy wants to jump on his own grenade - let's save some time and money and let this piece of garbage self-terminate.

Just my $0.02...
0100001101101111011011010110010100100000011000010110111001100100001000000111010001100001011010110110010100100000011010010111010000101110

huddleston101
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: 18 Dec 2012, 10:58
Location: va
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by huddleston101 » 03 Jun 2013, 15:08

jgreenberg01 wrote:It's infuriating to read that there is any defense that can be used for his actions. But when you read on in the article you see:
At a hearing in May, Hasan told Osborn that he wanted to plead guilty. But Army rules prohibit a judge from accepting a guilty plea to charges that could result in a death sentence. Osborn also denied his request to plead guilty to lesser murder charges, citing legal issues that could have arisen because his death penalty trial still would have proceeded.
We have some interesting rules - the guy wants to jump on his own grenade - let's save some time and money and let this piece of garbage self-terminate.

Just my $0.02...
:agree: :thumb:
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 03 Jun 2013, 15:37

The good news is that he is representing himself. Maybe that is as good as pleading guilty?

"A man who represents himself has a fool for a client." -Abraham Lincoln

Now they are saying that he will be able to question his victims at his trial. For a fair trail, I think this should be allowed just as they would allow Hasan's lawyer(s) to question them, if he had one.
But if I were one of the victims being questioned, I would also make it clear to him at about 10ft away, "That's close enough - lest I see you as a threat AGAIN."

Any argument & just say he wasn't SUPPOSED to have a gun on him last time, why should this time be met with any less caution?
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

Stitches1974
Member
Posts: 318
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:23
Location: Missouri

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Stitches1974 » 06 Jun 2013, 18:24

Surprised no one has posted this yet. http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/fort-hood-sh ... ing-trial/


"(Washington Times) Nidal Malik Hasan, the U.S. Army Major accused of killing 13 and injuring 30 others in a mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas on November 5, 2009, has received around $278,000 in salary payments over the three-and-a-half years he has been awaiting trial.

According to an NBC 5 Investigates report from Dallas-Fort Worth NBC affiliate NBC 5, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense confirmed its continued payments to Hasan, stating that the department can’t suspend his salary until he has been proven guilty."

Yet, his victims have not gotten any restitution and having issues getting VA/ service benefits. :ponder: :wall: :furious:

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 06 Jun 2013, 18:48

I knew about the pay until guilty thing but his victims & their families? WTF?
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

Stitches1974
Member
Posts: 318
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:23
Location: Missouri

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Stitches1974 » 08 Jun 2013, 10:37

Rapier1772 wrote:I knew about the pay until guilty thing but his victims & their families? WTF?
One of the survivors of the shooting actually started a fund to help support the other survivors.
http://www.32stillstanding.com/Fort_Hoo ... en_TX.html

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 23 Aug 2013, 11:26

I guess he doesn't get paid any more
http://news.yahoo.com/fort-hood-gunman- ... ories.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Hasan was found guilty on all counts, including 13 charges of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder.
Sentencing next week

Maybe we can take his pay back to offset a bit of the legal bills?
The military spent four years and $5 million to ensure Hasan would be convicted and be eligible for a death sentence.
$5 million? Why?

Based on what I've read, I am pretty sure he wants to die. Hope he gets his wish.
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

User avatar
Cyberfly
Global Moderator
Posts: 10624
Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 18:44
custom title: Mens Room Attendant
Location: SE OKlahoma

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Cyberfly » 23 Aug 2013, 13:42

Death by a thousand paper cuts, then rolled in pig waste and pork blood and let him die by infection.
He can await his 72 Virginians in the afterlife...
Never confuse 'The will of the Majority' with 'The will of God'.
**This post created with 100% recycled photons!**

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 28 Aug 2013, 12:02

Fort Hood Shooter Nidal Hasan Gets Death Penalty
http://news.yahoo.com/fort-hood-shooter ... ories.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maj. Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused of killing 13 people in a shooting rampage at Ft. Hood, was unanimously sentenced to death today by a jury of military officers.
[Unfortunately]
Executions in the military are rare. All death sentences are subject to automatic appeal, a process that can take decades. There are currently five inmates on the military's death row, but an active serviceman has not been executed since 1961.
Over the course of the three week trial, the government called 89 witnesses, none of whom the major cross-examined. He called none of his own witnesses and immediately rested his case when he had the chance to defend himself.
Like I said, he wants to die. I say we hasten that along but now the appeal process starts (its an automatic thing apparently). Waste of money

Also, can we please stop calling him Major now?
Last edited by Rapier1772 on 28 Aug 2013, 14:39, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Thanks Blue
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

User avatar
blueorison
Competition/Training Mod
Posts: 10672
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 14:28
custom title: UT/EA Pistol Captain
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by blueorison » 28 Aug 2013, 14:22

You mean stop calling him Major? Yeah. Agreed.
Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
The shooter will always matter more than the gear ever will.
Stop relying on others to do the work for you.
Shoot more, worry less.

kismetcapitan
Junior Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 17:09

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by kismetcapitan » 03 Jan 2014, 15:20

ShockedNKansas wrote:There's been a lot of talk in the hearing about the victim's autopsy reports. This is going to sound sick but... is there a way for us to see them? Perhaps via the Freedom of Information Act?
While it's morbid to glean data from the autopsies of the victims of a psychotic murderer, it is hard data concerning the performance of the 5.7x28mm round.

- Hasan scored 18 torso or head hits. 13 died, 5 survived.
- 28 victims were hit in non-vital areas or limbs. All survived.
- Hasan was charged by four people. 1 survived. None were successful in reaching him.
- The SS197 round shattered a femur, making it impossible for Officer Munley to continue to engage her target.
- Hasan, who was clearly suicidal, was finally stopped by four 9mm rounds. He (unfortunately) survived as a paraplegic.

There are plenty of debates regarding the Five-seveN as a "viable" personal defense handgun. By personal defense, what we really mean is how effective is the weapon against human targets. Since the public does not have ready access to anti-personnel performance of the Five-seveN by the Secret Service or other government/LE agencies, the Fort Hood massacre is really the only source of data available. And it answers many questions that ballistic gel cannot and really should put the argument to rest.

- As expected, shot placement matters. This implies that a firearm that is easier to shoot on target will be more deadly than one that is difficult to control, REGARDLESS of caliber.
- Any bullet that can shatter a bone will stop an attacker. In the oft-repeated hypothetical scenario of a drugged and unstoppable assailant high on PCP or some other anesthetizing drug, even if he cannot feel pain, he cannot continue to charge with a shattered leg.
- The Fort Hood incident is notable in that four individuals charged the shooter, and all were stopped before they could reach him. For stopping power, the Five-seveN was 100% effective. And if anyone were to argue that those attempting to stop and disarm Hasan were sober, I submit that a US Army soldier, motivated to save the lives of others without regard to personal safety and acting on that motivation, is as physically difficult to stop as any human may be.

Stopping power is often equated with a round's ability to instantaneously kill a human. Stopping power in reality is the ability of a round to stop a human from attacking, and lethality is not inherently a part of stopping an attack. I selected the Five-seveN after becoming convinced from available data (most notably the above massacre) that the 5.7x28 round is at least as effective as a 9mm (and probably more so) and noting that it is easier to put rounds quickly on target with the 5.7x28 than any other available pistol round with the exception of subsonic match grade .22LR. It is very tragic that a psychotic employed a weapon as lethal as the Five-seveN to commit such an atrocity. And it leaves no question as to the lethality or stopping power of the Five-seveN.

This post may be quoted or cross-posted.

User avatar
panzermk2
Forum Supporter
Posts: 12377
Joined: 19 Aug 2008, 15:51
Location: Pr. CEO Elite Ammunition
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by panzermk2 » 03 Jan 2014, 22:51

kismetcapitan wrote:
ShockedNKansas wrote:T

There are plenty of debates regarding the Five-seveN as a "viable" personal defense handgun. By personal defense, what we really mean is how effective is the weapon against human targets. Since the public does not have ready access to anti-personnel performance of the Five-seveN by the Secret Service or other government/LE agencies, the Fort Hood massacre is really the only source of data available. And it answers many questions that ballistic gel cannot and really should put the argument to rest.
.

Actually there are hundreds almost thousands of reports from south of the boarder. The FsN is the preferred gun of the drug cartels and is used to kill peolpe daily.
Jay Wolf
Pr. Elite Ammunition

"Engineers, the oompa-loompas of science!"

Be'ein Tachbulot Yipol Am Veteshua Berov Yoetz
Image

kismetcapitan
Junior Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 17:09

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by kismetcapitan » 03 Jan 2014, 23:54

panzermk2 wrote:
kismetcapitan wrote:
ShockedNKansas wrote:T

There are plenty of debates regarding the Five-seveN as a "viable" personal defense handgun. By personal defense, what we really mean is how effective is the weapon against human targets. Since the public does not have ready access to anti-personnel performance of the Five-seveN by the Secret Service or other government/LE agencies, the Fort Hood massacre is really the only source of data available. And it answers many questions that ballistic gel cannot and really should put the argument to rest.
.

Actually there are hundreds almost thousands of reports from south of the boarder. The FsN is the preferred gun of the drug cartels and is used to kill peolpe daily.
Exactly! It boggles my mind when someone calls it a toy, a plinker, or an overpriced .22. If those who commit violent crimes are hip to the lethality of the Five-seveN, it most certainly is more than enough for lawful use in self defense, home invasion, or stopping an extremely violent crime in progress.

Buffman
Silver Member
Posts: 2990
Joined: 12 Jan 2009, 22:48
Location: SW Michigan
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Buffman » 04 Jan 2014, 09:48

But wait I can just post the same thread about small caliber PDW's from the Doc and it's all over :|
Last edited by Buffman on 04 Jan 2014, 10:03, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 04 Jan 2014, 09:51

You mean the dentist data from 20ys ago?

You forgot the sarcasm font
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

Buffman
Silver Member
Posts: 2990
Joined: 12 Jan 2009, 22:48
Location: SW Michigan
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Buffman » 04 Jan 2014, 10:03

That's pink right?

kismetcapitan
Junior Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 01 Jan 2014, 17:09

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by kismetcapitan » 04 Jan 2014, 10:29

I just looked at that thread. It's strange, that's for certain. Lots of people citing this test or that test. No one citing the available data on 5.7 performance against humans

Or perhaps their biases lead them to ignore the anti-personnel performance of one cowardly psychiatrist with little handgun experience, armed with a FsN. In the hands of a trained operator highly motivated to protect, it logically will be equally if not more lethal.

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12938
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: Benton City, WA

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Rapier1772 » 04 Jan 2014, 10:53

Buffman wrote:That's pink right?
Yeah but just use the sarcasm button, it will take care of the coloring.

Although perthonally, I'd have gone for a lighter shade. :laugh:
How to post pics & videos: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6363
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.

User avatar
Ditch
Platinum Member
Posts: 265
Joined: 05 Oct 2012, 16:35
Location: Eastern NC

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Ditch » 07 Feb 2015, 03:21

WASHINGTON — The Army announced Friday that it will award the Purple Heart and its civilian counterpart, the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, to victims of a 2009 shooting at Fort Hood, Texas.
http://www.stripes.com/news/army-to-awa ... s-1.328220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
For Those Who Came Home...
For Those Who Did Not Come Home...
For Those Who Have Yet To Come Home...

Stitches1974
Member
Posts: 318
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:23
Location: Missouri

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by Stitches1974 » 07 Feb 2015, 06:54

Ditch wrote:
WASHINGTON — The Army announced Friday that it will award the Purple Heart and its civilian counterpart, the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, to victims of a 2009 shooting at Fort Hood, Texas.
http://www.stripes.com/news/army-to-awa ... s-1.328220" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
About effing time. It should have been awarded from the get go. Hopefully the special benefits that go along with the award will help some of those families.

User avatar
jgreenberg01
Platinum Member
Posts: 3737
Joined: 17 Jul 2009, 14:32
custom title: FNP-45 Cylon
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Contact:

Re: Ft. Hood

Post by jgreenberg01 » 07 Feb 2015, 07:07

Wait, does this mean this was more than your typical workplace violence by an individual screaming allahu akbar?
0100001101101111011011010110010100100000011000010110111001100100001000000111010001100001011010110110010100100000011010010111010000101110

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests