Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Discuss the politics behind the gun industry.
Post Reply
User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12133
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: American Falls, ID

Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Rapier1772 » 04 Feb 2015, 20:02

http://news.yahoo.com/ferguson-police-t ... 26288.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ferguson police are testing new methods of incapacitating suspects — six months after a highly controversial police shooting involving one of their officers.
This week, five instructors for the Missouri city’s police department are training to use a "less lethal" device, called the Alternative, which has enough force to knock a suspect to the ground but not kill him or her.
The Alternative is a small orange device that attaches to the top of a normal handgun and extends a Ping-Pong-ball-sized projectile in front of the muzzle.
After traveling through the barrel, the bullet embeds itself inside the alloy projectile, and the docking unit immediately detaches from the weapon, according to the manufacturer.
This process decreases the bullet's velocity and dampens its impact. The bullet, then, should not pierce a human’s skin and cause the type of internal damage that would kill the person. However, it retains enough blunt force to knock someone over and deliver severe, debilitating pain
Why not make resisting arrest (& all that other crap you might get shot for) legal while they're at it? :skep:

I feel sorry for the police.
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.
Tactical Search Instructions & tips: http://www.fivesevenforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12045

Mister Freeze
Senior Member
Posts: 1627
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 11:11
custom title: 159.6
Location: Somewhere in Texas

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Mister Freeze » 05 Feb 2015, 05:47

sounds like a rifle-grenade type of device, propelled by an actual bullet

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12133
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: American Falls, ID

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Rapier1772 » 05 Feb 2015, 06:57

That's kind of what I thought too
But what happens when the "Alternative" fails to actually stop someone?
What happens if you have one of these on your gun & suddenly you're in a real fire fight?

Too many what-ifs but then I guess that is what testing is for right?
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.
Tactical Search Instructions & tips: http://www.fivesevenforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12045

User avatar
kfeltenberger
Gold Member
Posts: 59
Joined: 28 Mar 2012, 16:12
custom title: BSG-94 Chronicler
Contact:

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by kfeltenberger » 05 Feb 2015, 07:37

So I guess my idea of riot police riding bears won't be adopted.
Kurt

Oldbindlestiff
Gold Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 22 Apr 2011, 08:13
Location: Newport, TN

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Oldbindlestiff » 05 Feb 2015, 07:49

Karma. Serving up justice one a**hole at a time.

DoubleJ
Member
Posts: 400
Joined: 10 May 2011, 20:20

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by DoubleJ » 05 Feb 2015, 09:40

So wait, a bullet, due to the laws of physics, can't knock a person down. A bullet fired into a polymer ping pong ball can?

Stitches1974
Member
Posts: 318
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 07:23
Location: Missouri

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Stitches1974 » 05 Feb 2015, 10:37

DoubleJ wrote:So wait, a bullet, due to the laws of physics, can't knock a person down. A bullet fired into a polymer ping pong ball can?
Video posted above says an alloy projectile, but I agree with you. I think it will just piss someone off, rather than knocking them down. Wonder how long it will be after these hit the streets that a lawsuit comes out of it.

User avatar
kfeltenberger
Gold Member
Posts: 59
Joined: 28 Mar 2012, 16:12
custom title: BSG-94 Chronicler
Contact:

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by kfeltenberger » 05 Feb 2015, 11:07

Or someone gets shout in the face and loses an eye or has a cheekbone shattered, or gets shot in the groin and possibly loses a testicle or worse.

This is the equivalent of an idea dreamed up at 2AM in an alcohol fueled haze and sketched on the back of a bar napkin by two guys who only saw dollar signs in their idiocy.

If you are in a position to respond with a less than lethal weapon, use a Taser. Why anyone would think putting that dingus on a lethal weapon and hoping it it was done right is beyond me. "But...but...I thought it was installed correctly...I didn't mean to kill Jethro Brown..."
Kurt

Oldbindlestiff
Gold Member
Posts: 389
Joined: 22 Apr 2011, 08:13
Location: Newport, TN

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Oldbindlestiff » 05 Feb 2015, 11:31

Well, if employed in a "static" stand-off situation (with a back-up officer present), it might be useful. IF it works.

"Standfast, sir! I am deploying my non-lethal weapon." :lmao:

No misunderstanding, please. I am in favor of non-lethal alternatives, when and where appropriate.
Karma. Serving up justice one a**hole at a time.

User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12133
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: American Falls, ID

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Rapier1772 » 05 Feb 2015, 12:24

Also, what are the chances this device causes a firearm malfunction?
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.
Tactical Search Instructions & tips: http://www.fivesevenforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12045

User avatar
jgreenberg01
Platinum Member
Posts: 3736
Joined: 17 Jul 2009, 14:32
custom title: FNP-45 Cylon
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Contact:

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by jgreenberg01 » 05 Feb 2015, 12:36

kfeltenberger wrote:So I guess my idea of riot police riding bears won't be adopted.
Unarmed bears, no.

Bears with fricken laser beams, yes.
0100001101101111011011010110010100100000011000010110111001100100001000000111010001100001011010110110010100100000011010010111010000101110

PainKillaX
Senior Member
Posts: 3196
Joined: 08 Nov 2009, 21:01
custom title: I rep that west
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by PainKillaX » 05 Feb 2015, 13:29

Rapier1772 wrote: What happens if you have one of these on your gun & suddenly you're in a real fire fight?
The photo on the article says "no obstruction to the gun or its performance".

Figure with that M&P9 you're carrying 17+1, the first one pops out your less-than-lethal, you've still got 17 follow-up shots. I think this maybe offers an advantage over a standalone LTL, because you immediately have your firearm on target.

I'd guess that it also wouldn't be likely to cause a malfunction. At the point of impact the bullet will have already all but left the barrel. The failures I could see would be related to the device adding too much weight for the slide to properly recoil.


Good luck finding a holster for it...

Mister Freeze
Senior Member
Posts: 1627
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 11:11
custom title: 159.6
Location: Somewhere in Texas

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Mister Freeze » 05 Feb 2015, 13:55


User avatar
Rapier1772
Global Moderator
Posts: 12133
Joined: 20 Aug 2008, 09:00
Location: American Falls, ID

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Rapier1772 » 05 Feb 2015, 14:04

The holster isn't an issue, according to the vid Oldbindlestiff posted it is something you put on the gun after it is drawn.

My issue is if a BG is approaching, you decide a less lethal option is in order so you pop it on your gun. Now his buddies come out of the wood work & you're up smeg creek. So you fire the first round & the ball comes off but fails to incapacitate the attacker & on top of that, the mount which was supposed to eject off is somehow hung up & causing your gun to jam.
I am a firm believer in Murphy's Law & this was just one of the ways I see these things playing out.

Another thing which is mentioned in the article, what about those seconds it takes you to put the thing on your gun? You gonna yell "Time out!" & hope everyone stops in place? Or are you going to get stabbed/shot while putting this thing on your gun?


EDIT: Freeze, did you mean to post that here? Looks like it is more suited for the Thermal Micro Sights thread?
Contrary to popular belief, you CAN fix stupid - it's just illegal.
Tactical Search Instructions & tips: http://www.fivesevenforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12045

Weshowe
Junior Member
Posts: 32
Joined: 24 Nov 2012, 21:16

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Weshowe » 13 Feb 2015, 13:18

Gents,

We already have a "less than lethal" round. It's called a Shotgun with Bean Bags or Rubber Buckshot...

Doing that to a pistol is just plain asinine.

Wes

Middian
Junior Member
Posts: 55
Joined: 16 Jan 2014, 12:56

Re: Police to use "less lethal" attachment on their guns

Post by Middian » 13 Feb 2015, 18:16

Ya, this seems ridiculous! The police have plenty of non-lethal options, and this one seems to more of a hindrance to their lethal option.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests